ORIGINAL ACQUISITION TODAY

Michael Vincent

Abstract


An „Original Acquisition‟ (OA) justification of strong private property rights, allegedly first enunciated by John Locke, has in recent decades been increasingly adopted in some circles. These writers purport to demonstrate that as property rights may exist prior to, and provide a justification for, government and other forms of social constraint; they should therefore to the greatest possible extent be immune to the latter‟s interference. Yet many theorists equivocate as to whether the acquisition they write of is only an in-theory possibility, or whether it has occurred historically. Both approaches have benefits necessary for the complete OA justification sought; but crucially, the two are mutually exclusive. By overlooking this problem, OA theorists leave themselves in a precarious position, their work seemingly easily dismissed. However serious attempts to address the problem have resulted in theories that lack much of what is needed for OA to justify a regime of strong property rights.

References


Attas, Daniel. 2006. „Fragmenting Property‟, in Law and Philosophy 25. pp.119-49.

Becker, Lawrence C. 1977: Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Breakey, Hugh. (Forthcoming). Parsing MacPherson: The Last Rites of Locke the Possessive Individualist.

Epstein, Richard A. 1994. „Private and Common Property‟ in Property Rights, edited by Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Feser, E. 2005. „There Is No Such Thing As An Unjust Initial Acquisition‟ in Social Philosophy and Policy 22: pp.56-80.

Fried, Barbara, 1995. „Wilt Chamberlain Revisited: Nozick‟s „Justice in Transfer‟ and the Problem of Market-Based Distribution‟. in Philosophy and Public Affairs 24: pp.226–245.

Gibbard, Alan 1976: „Natural Property Rights‟. in Nous, 10.

Hohfeld, Wesley. 1964 [1919]. Fundamental Legal Conceptions, as applied in judicial reasoning. W. Cook (ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Honoré, A.M. 1961,. „Ownership‟ in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudnece, A.G. Guest (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Locke, John. 1965 [1690]. Treatise of Civil Government. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

MacPherson, C. B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

Munzer, Stephen. 1990. A Theory of Property. England: Cambridge University Press.

Narveson, Jan. 1988. The Libertarian Idea. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Schmidtz, David. 1994. „The Institution of Property‟ in Property Rights, edited by Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Simmons, A. John. 1993. On The Edge of Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Simmons, A. John. 1994. „Original-Acquisition Justifications of Private Property‟, in Property Rights, edited by Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Steiner, Hillel. 1978. „The Distribution Game‟. Analysis, vol 38. Jan. pp.61-2.

Waldron, Jeremy. 1988. The Right to Private Property. Oxford : Clarendon.

Waldron, Jeremy. 1994. „The Humean Theory of Property‟, in Property Rights, edited by Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenar, Lief. 1998. „Original Acquisition of Private Property‟ in Mind, Vol. 107, No. 428 (Oct., 1998) pp. 799-819.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.