MORALITY IS NOT GOOD

Samuel Green

Abstract


Moral nihilism (the denial of the existence of objective moral values) has been argued for for thousands of years. Despite such arguments this view is by no means the majority view. One of the most influential moral nihilists of the 20th Century was John Leslie Mackie, who gave arguments for this position. These arguments, despite many objections, have not been convincingly or decisively overcome. If the arguments are still good, why is moral nihilism such an uncommon view? One possible reason that this view is not more popular among moral philosophers is because it seems to lead to unacceptable consequences: moral fictionalism or abolitionism. I will argue that such philosophers are correct in rejecting moral fictionalism as unacceptable; but that abolitionism is actually a rational, reasonable position that should not cast doubt upon our morally nihilistic beliefs.

References


Braithwaite, J & Pettit, P (1990), Not just deserts: a republican theory of criminal justice. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Foot, P (1972), 'Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives'. The Philosophical Review, 81(3): 305-316.

Garner, R (2007), 'Abolishing Morality'. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10(5): 499-513.

Hinckfuss, I (1987), The moral society: its structure and effects. Australian National University.

Horgan, T & Timmons, M (1992), 'Troubles on moral twin earth: moral queerness revived'. Synthese 92: 221-260.

Mackie, J L (1977), Ethics: inventing right and wrong. New York, Penguin.

Nolan, D, Restall, G & West, C (2005), 'Moral fictionalism versus the rest'. Australasian Journal Philosophy, 83:307–330.

Oddie, G & Demetriou D (2007), 'The Fictionalist‟s Attitude Problem'. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10(5): 485-498.

Pigden, C (2007), 'Nihilism, Nietzsche and the Doppelganger Problem'. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10(5): 441-456.

Shepski, L (2008), 'The Vanishing Argument from Queerness'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86(3): 371-387.

Singer, P (1993), Practical Ethics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.